INVENTORS Archives - Page 2 of 2 - Martin IP Law Group

BRANDING, COPYRIGHTS, INNOVATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INVENTORS, MOVIES, PATENTS, TRADEMARKS

What’s the deal with the Barbie movie? The Legal Lessons of Blockbuster Hit

In the late 1950s, a new doll was sweeping the nation – Barbie. Trademarked in 1959 by Mattel, the rights to the name “Barbie” extend far beyond dolls. Clothing, car accessories, and other lifestyle items also fall under their intellectual property plan.

The new Barbie movie, directed by Greta Gerwig and starring Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling as Barbie and Ken, was released across the globe on July 21, 2023. With its $145 million set budget and $150 million marketing budget, it certainly exceeded expectations. The movie had the biggest box office debut of the year and is history’s biggest female solo-directed film.

The World Intellectual Property Organization states the brand has licensing deals with over 100 companies as part of the movie’s marketing plan. However, despite its success, this seemingly innocent movie about the world’s most well-known doll sheds light on the evolution of trademark protection, owner’s exclusive rights, and public expression.

Territorial Misrepresentations

You may have heard about Barbie’s legal challenge involving the “nine-dash line,” representing China and Taiwan’s claims of territory in the South China Sea. This illustration is seen on a cartoon-like map shown in the movie’s first half. Vietnam and the Philippines claim this misrepresents how the territories are actually split.

Forbes reports that the leader of the cinema department of the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism in Vietnam, Vi Kien Thanh, says, “Vietnam’s National Film Evaluation Council has decided the film would not be granted a license over its inclusion of the ‘illegal image.’”

Warner Bros. defends the map, describing it as a “whimsical, child-like crayon drawing” and stating that it represents “Barbie’s make-believe journey from Barbie Land to the real world.” While representatives say it was never meant to cause controversy, they aren’t making any moves to accommodate the alteration requests.

Music Matters

As a multibillion-dollar industry, Hollywood seems untouchable and far removed from the lives of middle-class working people – so do large toy companies like Mattel, Barbie’s manufacturers. Plus, how does this all fit into intellectual property law?

Two decades ago, “Barbie Girl” was released by Aqua. Not surprisingly, this led to a lawsuit between the Danish band and Mattel over using the popular doll’s name in the lyrics. Since the song was considered a parody, it was protected by the First Amendment.

During the credits, the 2023 movie features a remix of this song, titled “Barbie World (With Aqua)” by Nicki Minaj and Ice Spice. Instead of leading to a lawsuit like its predecessor, Mattel embraced the song without hesitation.

Mattel, Inc. vs. MCA Records, Inc. shows that no one is exempt from trademark infringement, even massive corporations. It also raises questions about parody and brand rights.

Intellectual property laws exist for a reason, to protect ideas central to a business’s brand identity and legacy. Like Barbie, many trademarks and copyrighted materials are household names and deserve to be appropriately preserved – just like small business owners’ and entrepreneurs’ ideas do.

At Martin IP Law, our legal experts work with all types of intellectual property (IP), including trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and patents. After you check out the new Barbie movie, schedule a consultation with us today to learn if our services fit your IP needs.

BRANDING, COPYRIGHTS, ENTREPRENEUR, INNOVATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INVENTORS, PATENTS, SOCIAL MEDIA, TRADEMARKS

Twitter Trademark – Is It Legal?

When you see a little blue bird, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? If you’re an active social media user, it’s probably Twitter. Since March of 2006, the distinctive emblem coupled with its bright blue hue, has become widely recognized.

However, Elon Musk, Twitter’s newest owner, has changed its branding – a logo and name that’s stuck with the company for the past 17 years. Now, it’s just X with a white “X” logo inscription on a black background. Musk also altered Twitter.com to X.com.

Before Musk’s ownership, Jack Dorsey, Evan Williams, and Christopher Stone were the company’s co-founders. During this time, the logo was only changed three times. While Dorsey and his colleagues were no strangers to controversy, Musk’s recent rebranding has sparked debate about whether this was a logical choice – and the legality of it.

Trademarking the Alphabet

Because the logo is just the letter “X”, trademarking is tricky. Nondescript marks, which include letters and numbers, are trademarkable but require substantial proof for acceptance. The most important thing to prove is that the mark is distinctive enough from other businesses’ trademarks. The letter or number must give a second meaning (apart from the original) associated with a business or organization. If it’s too general, the chances of acceptance are slim.

Potential Complications Ahead

According to the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO), trademarks protect a business’s name, logo, and designs related to its products or services. It also stops other businesses from using your name in any form of fashion. This is where things get tricky.

Take McDonalds™, for example. Kantar reports that the fast-food chain is one of the world’s most valuable businesses, coming in 5th place after other large companies like Google and Amazon. Despite its size, the name wouldn’t be protected without a trademark. The company also owns the rights to the golden arches logo and the phrases “Egg McMuffin,” “Happy Meal,” “McNugget,” and more, making these designs and terms off-limits for others in the restaurant industry.

If another business were to market or profit off these terms in any way, they would be committing trademark infringement. According to the USPTO, this is an “unauthorized use of a trademark or service mark on or in connection with goods and/or services in a manner that is likely to cause confusion, deception, or mistake about the source of the goods and/or services.” When this happens, the offender can be sued, served a court order to remove anything with the stolen trademark, or other legal consequences.

Our blog about the 2022 Bridgerton trademark and copyright infringement debacle details how this looks in real-time.

Limited Protections, Higher Liability

In short, Twitter’s trademark is legal, but it’s complicated. Since the “X” design is so simple, it may be hard to distinguish it from other businesses’ use of the same branding. This limits the amount of protection Twitter has over its new name and logo, narrowing opportunities for future use.

It’s going up against other tech giants like Microsoft and Meta (formerly Facebook) – plus the thousands of other, smaller businesses that have already trademarked some form of the letter X. Currently, this number is estimated to be almost 900. Because of these numbers, the company will likely experience challenges with its trademark.

Either way, trademarks this broad open the door to potential legal action from other businesses. And because Twitter’s biggest competitors are already using similar branding, although, for lesser-known branding projects, the consequences of this latest rebranding might come more quickly than expected.

Trademark Specialists at Martin IP Law Group

While we don’t know the future of Twitter and its rebranding, we do know we can help you with your trademark ideas. If you’re looking to gain exclusive rights to your brand’s logo, designs, and more, the Martin IP Law Group is ready to get you started.

COPYRIGHTS, ENTREPRENEUR, FRACTIONAL IP COUNSEL, INNOVATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INVENTORS, PATENTS, TRADE SECRETS, TRADEMARKS

What is Intellectual Property (IP)?

As a business owner, inventor, or creative thinker, coming up with unique, new, and innovative ideas is what you’re best at. But despite the individuality that comes with creating new concepts, it’s easy to have them stolen in today’s consumer culture. The old saying, “copying is the oldest form of flattery,” isn’t as true today as it was in the past.

Stealing an idea and profiting from it as if it was your own has always been frowned upon, but being copied in 2023 could significantly impact your business – or land you in a lengthy legal battle. While the Martin IP Law Group team can help if this happens, we’d rather help ensure that your ideas, or intellectual property (IP), are protected from the beginning.

Let’s start by defining what IP is. The World Intellectual Property Organization defines intellectual property as “creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names, and images used in commerce.” These are all intangible assets, which carry the same weight as tangible assets.

What are the different types of intellectual property protection?

Intellectual property laws give you exclusive rights to your property and allow you to sell it to the public and profit from it. However, there are different types of IP protection.

Copyright: Copyrights protect literary or artistic creations like books, films (i.e., movies, documentaries), software, or music. It prevents other business owners from distributing, reproducing, or using the work in other ways without permission. For example, an author would copyright a series of books to stop other writers from copying their ideas.

Trademark: A trademark is a unique word, phrase, design, or symbol distinguishing a business’s products or services. Other businesses cannot create a similar or identical material with this protection. Brands like Apple or Burger King are examples of trademarks.

Patent: Patents are government-granted exclusive rights protecting inventions or discoveries. The patent owner is the only one allowed to produce, use, or sell it. Some of the most well-known patents are items you use every day, such as the telephone (Alexander Graham Bell) and the lightbulb (Thomas Edison).

Trade Secrets: Unlike the other types of IP protection, trade secrets are confidential pieces of information vital to the operation of a business. Examples are manufacturing processes, customer lists, or marketing strategies. When this information is classified as a trade secret, it prohibits public disclosure or competitor use. Famous trade secrets include the Coca-Cola recipe or the KFC Original Recipe.

How do you start protecting your intellectual property?

IP laws help maintain a balance between creativity and providing incentives for individuals and organizations like you to invest their time, resources, and talents into producing groundbreaking ideas and original products. At Martin IP Law Group, we work with entrepreneurs to protect their information, propelling your business toward success. From the application process to celebrating the finalization of IP rights, our legal experts are with you every step of the way. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

COPYRIGHTS, ENTREPRENEUR, FRACTIONAL IP COUNSEL, INNOVATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INVENTORS, PATENTS, TRADE SECRETS, TRADEMARKS

What’s New at the USPTO?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released new updates about the patenting process! Here’s everything you need to know about the changes.

As a new patent holder, one of the things you might look forward to the most is receiving your certified patent grant. With its gold seal and official display, it gives you something to show for your accomplishment. However, as of 2023, these certificates will no longer be sent to patentees – or, at least not for free.

So how does this benefit you?

Although you now have to pay more for a physical paper certificate, it does reduce the time it takes between when the issue fee is paid and the issuance of the patent. In addition to that, if you’re a client of Martin IP Law Group, you’ll get your certificate AND a plaque with a copy of your patent on it. We know how important it is to commemorate your accomplishment, and we want to celebrate with you!

The USPTO is also reducing rates for micro and small entities, saving you money and making it easier for small and local businesses to obtain a patent. Instead of a 50% and 75% reduction, you can receive 60% or 80% off the total cost.

Both updates went into effect after April 2023.

Want to stay in the know about future USPTO updates and other legal news? Follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, or Facebook to keep up with everything intellectual property-related!

ENTREPRENEUR, FRACTIONAL IP COUNSEL, INNOVATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INVENTORS, PATENTS, TRADE SECRETS

USPTO First-Time Filer Expedited Program Requirements

As you may have heard, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently announced the new “First-Time Filer Expedited Examination Pilot Program.” In years past, this expedited process would cost several thousand dollars, but it’s currently being offered for no additional charge. Inventors must typically wait over 20 months for an examiner to review the application and return a written notice of findings. With this pilot program, that time is reduced to less than two months in most cases! The pilot program does have some rules and guidelines you need to know before filing.

First, let’s go over the patent basics. Starting with, who can apply? You, your legal representative, or you and a joint inventor, with the exception of the death of an inventor, the inventor refusing to apply, or the inventor cannot be found. Your invention must also oblige with these four conditions. The invention has the ability to be used, a clear description of how to make and use the invention, the invention is new and not something that has been done before, and the invention is new and not a change to something that has already been invented.

Congratulations, you’ve met all the basic patent requirements! Now, can you file in the USPTO First-Time Filer Expedited Examination Pilot Program? First, you must be a first-time filer; your name cannot be on other nonprovisional applications. The applicant and/or joint inventors must qualify under the gross income basis requirement for micro entity status. Inventors must understand the basics of the patent application process. The pilot program is not open to those continuing applications, applications claiming a right of foreign policy, and those entering the national stage under the Patent Cooperation Treaty.

Lastly, let’s go over the basics for the application to the USPTO First-Time Filer Expedited Examination Pilot Program. Your application must include a specification of the invention, drawings if necessary, at least one claim, an oath or declaration in compliance with 37 CFR 1.63 for each named inventor, and payment of all appropriate fees prior to or concurrently with filing the petition.

Remember, this opportunity lasts until there are 1,000 applicants or March 11, 2025. If you’re interested in this opportunity to bring your invention’s impact to life much quicker than typically expected, contact our team to set up a consultation! The Martin IP Law team has helped successfully register hundreds of patents for our clients.